KOLEL
LOBBY
Online
Courses
Bracha
Course Outline
Class Discussion
Help
Glossary

Eating from the Tree of Life: A Course on the Zohar

Translated Texts

JACOB & ESAU

INTRODUCTION

Before reading this passage, you might want to reread the stories of Jacob and Esau in the Bible, Genesis 25:19-33, 26:34-28:9, 32:4-33:16, 35:28-36:8 [pgs. 173ff in the Plaut Commentary].

In midrashic tradition, Jacob, the ancestor of the twelve tribes of Israel, represents the Jewish people. His first-born twin brother Esau represents the oppressive non-Jewish world, especially the Roman Empire, and in medieval times the Catholic Church. 

Seeing Esau as the wicked oppressor fits only awkwardly, however, with the Biblical stories. After all, Isaac, Jacob's father, the ancestor of all Jews, loves Esau best. And while Esau is a hunter and becomes a chieftain and ancestor of kings, he does not do Jacob any harm; it is Jacob who outwits his brother several times and takes his birthright and blessing away from him. Indeed Jacob's name, which comes from the word for the heel of the foot, also has a connotation of trickery. 

    "In biblical narrative... deception is considered an acceptable and generally praiseworthy means for a weaker party to succeed against a stronger power".

Jacob is the weaker party, the underdog, because he is the second-born, and in the Biblical story the expectation of society is for the first-born to get the best of everything. Also, in typical fairy-tale fashion the Torah introduces Jacob as a simpleton ("ish tam", Genesis 25:27), whose resourcefulness comes as a surprise. Later interpreters, however, seeing Jacob as a Jewish role model rather than an archetypal trickster, were morally troubled by his story. 

The Zohar responds to these dilemmas by transposing the human drama to the cosmic level, with challenging results.

 

"In biblical narrative...": Ora Horn Prouser, "The Truth About Women and Lying", in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 61 (1994) 15-28.

TEXT: JACOB AND ESAU
Zohar I (Toledot) 137b f.

Rabbi Yehudah's young son asked: Why did Isaac not love Jacob as much as Esau, since he knew (prophetically) that he would establish twelve tribes through Jacob?


(Rabbi Yehudah) said to him: You have spoken well. The answer is that every species loves its own species; a species is drawn after, and follows, its own species.

Come and see! Esau emerged red, as it is written: "The first came out all reddish".

Genesis 25:25-26:
Vayeitsei harishon admoni kulo, k'aderet sei-ar, vayikr'u sh'mo Eisav. V'acharei kein yatsa achiv, v'yado ochezet ba-akeiv Eisav, vayikra sh'mo Ya-akov; v'Yits'chak ben shishim shana b'ledet otam.

"The first came out all reddish, like a hairy garment, and they called him Esau. And after that his brother came out, and his hand was clinging to Esau's heel (akeiv), and he called him Jacob (ya-akov). Isaac was sixty years old when (Rebecca) gave birth to them."
That is the species of Isaac, who is harsh judgment on high. Esau, who is harsh judgement below, emerged from him, looking like his own species.

And every species goes to its own species, and because of this (Isaac) loved Esau more than Jacob, as it is written, "Isaac dearly loved Esau because of his trapping food for him". 

It is written here, "because of his trapping food for him" and it is written there, "so it is said, 'Like Nimrod, a mighty man of trapping before YHVH'".

Rabbi Yitzchak said: It is written, "The children were crushing inside her, and she said, 'If so, what am I for?' and she went to inquire of YHVH". To what place did she go? To the study-house of Shem and Ever.


"The children were crushing inside her" -- because there that wicked Esau was waging war against Jacob. "Crushing" -- they were breaking, as in our expression: "crush its brain!"

They broke with each other and separated.

Genesis 25:28:
Vaye-ehav Yits'chak et Eisav ki tsayid b'fiv, v'Rivka ohevet et Ya-akov.

"Isaac dearly loved Esau because of his trapping food for him, but Rebecca loved Jacob".

In midrashic tradition, Nimrod was the first tyrannical king, and tried to kill Abraham.

Genesis 10:9:
Hu haya gibor tsayid lifnei Adonai; al kein yei-amar, k'Nimrod, gibor tsayid lifnei Adonai.

"(Nimrod) was a mighty man of trapping before YHVH; so it is said: 'Like Nimrod, a mighty man of trapping before YHVH'."


"The children were crushing inside her..." -- Genesis 25:22:

Vayitrotsatsu habanim b'kirba, vatomer, im kein, lama zeh anochi? Vateilech lidrosh et Adonai.

Shem and Ever were the son and grandson of Noah, the earliest ancestors of the Jewish people. According to the Biblical chronologies of their ages they were still alive at this time; according to midrash, they were running a yeshivah.

Jerusalem Talmud, Kiddushin 48a:
Rabbi Shim'on ben Yochai [the hero of the Zohar] says: "Even the best of serpents -- crush its brain!"

Come and see: that side rides on the serpent (see below), and this side rides on the complete, holy throne -- on the side of the sun [shamsha], to make love [l'shamsha] with the moon.

 

And come and see: Because Esau was drawn after that serpent, Jacob dealt with him crookedly, like the serpent, who is wise and deals crookedly, as you say, "the serpent was cunning..." -- wise. So Jacob's actions toward him were like a serpent to him.

And it was necessary for him to do this, in order to draw Esau after that serpent, so that he would separate from him and not have a portion with him in this world or in the world to come. We have learned: "Someone is coming to murder you -- you kill him first!"

Genesis 3:1:
V'hanachash haya arum mikol chayat hasadeh asher asah Adonai Elohim, vayomer el ha-isha, af ki amar Elohim lo tochlu mikol eits hagan.

The serpent was cunning, more than all the animals of the field which YHVH God had made, and it said to the woman, "Even though God said not to eat from all from the trees of the garden..."

Talmud Berachot 58a and parallels:
"If someone is coming to murder you, act quickly to murder him."

It is written, "In the womb he took his brother by the heel" -- he threw him down below by that heel. 

As it is written, "His hand was clinging to Esau's heel" -- he put his hand on that heel, to overturn him.

Another interpretation of "his hand was clinging..." -- he could not get away from him altogether, but "his hand was clinging to Esau's heel". Because of this it was necessary for him to move wisely with him, in order to push him down below, for him to adhere to his place.

Hosea 12:2-3
V'riv l'Adonai im Yehuda, v'lifkod al Ya-akov kidrachav, k'ma-alalav yashiv lo. Babeten akav et achiv, uv'ono sarah et Elohim.

"YHVH has a quarrel with Judah, and will punish Jacob for his ways, repay him for his deeds. In the womb he took his brother by the heel; in his strength he wrestled with God."

Genesis 25:26:
V'acharei kein yatsa achiv, v'yado ochezet ba-akeiv Eisav, vayikra sh'mo Ya-akov; v'Yits'chak ben shishim shana b'ledet otam.

"And after that his brother came out, and his hand was clinging to Esau's heel (akeiv), and he called him Jacob (ya-akov); and Isaac was sixty years old when (Rebecca) gave birth to them."

Genesis 27:36. Esau has just heard from Isaac that Jacob has obtained his blessing by trickery:

Vayomer hachi kara sh'mo Ya-akov, vaya-akveini zeh fa-amayim, et b'chorati lakach v'hinei ata lakach birchati! Vayomar, halo atsalti li bracha?

"(Esau) said: 'Is this why he called him Jacob, because he has gotten me under his heel twice? He took my birthright, and now he has taken my blessing!' And he said, 'Have you not kept a blessing for me?'"

 

"He called him Jacob". Truly, the Blessed Holiness called him Jacob. Come and see: it is written: "Is this why he called him Jacob..." "He was called Jacob" is not written, but "He called him." 
"...[Because] he has gotten me under his heel...?" -- indeed. The Blessed Holiness saw that the primordial snake was wise in doing evil. When Jacob came, He said, "truly, he is correspondingly wise" -- and therefore He called him Jacob.

We have established that an anonymous "he called", wherever it occurs, is the last level, as it is written, "He called to Moses".

And here, "He called his name Jacob". Wherever his name was called, it was not by a human being. Elsewhere, what is written? "God called him 'the God of Israel'" -- the Blessed Holiness called Jacob God. He said to him: I am God on high and you are God below.

And come and see: Jacob knew that Esau would adhere to that crooked snake, and because of this, in all his actions, he was drawn upon him like another crooked snake, with wisdom, with crookedness, and this was necessary.

So it comes out as Rabbi Shim'on has said: What is written? "God created the great sea-serpents" -- they are Jacob and Esau. "And all the breathing life that crawls..." -- these are the rest of the levels between them.

Truly, Jacob made himself wise, as much as that other snake, and this was necessary.

Leviticus 1:1
Vayikra el Moshe, vay'daber Adonai eilav mei-ohel mo-eid, leimor:

"He called to Moses, and YHVH spoke to him from the Tent of Meeting, saying..."

Genesis 33:20
Vayatsev sham mizbeyach, vayikra lo Eil Elohei Yisra-eil.

Usual translation: "(Jacob) built an altar there, and he called it, 'God is the God of Israel'."

The Zohar's translation comes from the Talmud, Megillah 18a:
"Rabbi Acha said that Rabbi El'azar said: From where do we learn that the Blessed Holiness called Jacob God? It is written, vayikra lo Eil Elohei Yisra-eil -- God called him, 'the God of Israel'."

Genesis 1:21:
Vayivra Elohim et hataninim hag'dolim, v'eit kol nefesh hachaya haromeset asher shartsu hamayim l'mineihem, v'eit kol of kanaf l'mineihu, vayar Elohim ki tov.

"God created the great sea-serpents, and all the breathing life that crawls, with which the water swarms, in their species, and all the winged birds in their species, and God saw that it was good."

COMMENTARY: JACOB AND ESAU

The Zohar's answer to the moral dilemmas of the Jacob and Esau stories depends on a set of correspondences that are simple but have startling implications. In a common theme of the Zohar, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob embodied the Sefirot of Chesed, Gevurah and Tif'eret.

Abraham is Chesed, Isaac is Gevurah, Jacob is Tif'eret, which emerges from Gevurah as one Sefirah unfolds from another. Of all the Sefirot, Tif'eret is most like the God of traditional prayers. (The Talmud already claims that God called Jacob God.]) 

 

This embodiment of the Sefirot is somewhat similar to the Christian teaching that Jesus was an incarnation of the second person of the Trinity. The Zohar may have deliberately adopted and reworked this Christian idea.

 

This passage does not develop a specific role for Rebecca (Rivka), Esau and Jacob's mother. Essentially she is merged with Isaac as the source of Esau and Jacob. The only comment on her in herself comes from earlier Midrash. It is a good example of how the rabbis imagined the world of the Bible as their own world: when Rebecca had a question to ask, she went to the rabbis in the yeshivah of Shem and Ever.   


On the other hand, Esau, the wicked brother in midrashic tradition, is Sama'el, the devil. (In earlier midrash, Sama'el is Esau's supernatural counterpart, his guardian angel.)

The Zohar's vision of reality as a plural unity tests its own limits when it touches on demonic forces. As noted in our introduction, it sees these forces as very dangerous and real. In many respects Sama'el is an independent force, an enemy of God. Yet from another perspective he too is part of the divine unity, and the Zohar shows this by including him in the genealogy of the family of Genesis, which embodies the divine emanation, the unfolding of one Sefirah from another.


Each of these aspects of spiritual reality has a feminine counterpart. The counterpart of Tif'eret is Malkhut; besides the human imagery, She is the throne and He is the king who rests on Her; She is the moon and He is the sun whose light She absorbs and reflects. In this passage She is also called "the last level" and "the Blessed Holiness".
("The Blessed Holiness" (Kudsha brikh Hu) usually means Tif'eret but can refer to other Sefirot as well, even those that are usually imagined in the feminine.)


Elsewhere in the Zohar, the feminine counterpart of Sama'el is often called Lilith; here, she is the serpent from the Garden of Eden story. (So the Zohar says that Esau "rides on the serpent", with a sexual connotation.)


Sama'el himself is also called a serpent, or snake: "the primordial snake". In general the serpent represents Samael's role, his place in the scheme of things. So the Zohar says that Jacob had to "draw Esau after that serpent, so that he would separate from him", and that he had to "push him down below, for him to adhere to his place." "That serpent" and "his place" are equivalents. The serpent is the place in the scheme of things to which Sama'el must be confined, which he must "adhere to". If he were to take his serpent energy beyond certain boundaries, all of existence would be in danger.

Kabbalistically, it makes sense that Esau is the beloved son of Isaac, because the demonic forces primarily come from Gevurah. This is why the Torah emphasizes Esau's red colour; red is the colour of Gevurah, as mentioned in our first text, The Rose. Gevurah is harshness, strictness, saying no. When this energy goes a little too far it becomes a no to life, utter destructiveness, evil. 

In the unfolding of the Sefirot, the energy of Isaac/Gevurah grows in two ways. At first, it presses on in its own direction, outward, over the edge, and becomes Sama'el, represented by Esau, the first-born. Then Gevurah's energy collects itself and refocuses toward the centre, balancing with Chesed, and becomes Tif'eret, Jacob. Tif'eret is about a blending of Gevurah with Chesed, but Sama'el is pure unmitigated Gevurah. Therefore it makes sense that Gevurah loves Sama'el, that Isaac loves Esau. It also makes sense -- startling as it is -- that the Devil is the older brother of God, in God's central manifestation as Tif'eret.

The identification of Isaac with Gevurah may seem surprising because Isaac is noteworthy for his receptive, passive role in the Biblical stories. One way of looking at this is that Gevurah can be inward-focused -- in self-restraint and self-control -- or outward-focused in restraint and control over others. Isaac manifests the former and Esau, the hunter, the latter. (The Zohar juxtaposes Esau with the tyrannical king Nimrod to suggest that his aggressive hunting energy was felt in the human realm as well.) 


In the Zohar's interpretation of the conflict between Jacob and Esau, Jacob/Tif'eret, aware of the evil power of Esau/Sama'el, proactively responds in kind, fighting fire with fire. This provides a mystical understanding of Jacob's morally unacceptable trickery. It was necessary to use evil means in order to defeat the power of evil and keep it in its place. Yet, while the ends justify the means, the means still have consequences. Jacob/Tif'eret is tainted by the conflict with Esau/Sama'el. He remains stuck to him -- "he could not get away from him altogether, but his hand was clinging to Esau's heel". He is more like him than he, or we, may find comfortable. "The great sea-serpents" of the beginning of Genesis are Jacob and Esau.  The verse goes on to mention "all the breathing life that crawls" which, the Zohar says, covers all the divine and demonic powers surrounding them, without distinction.


The distinction between the demonic and the divine is blurred in a different way in our next selection.

JACOB AND ESAU: QUESTIONS FOR STUDY AND DISCUSSION

The Zohar's picture of the place of evil in the realm of the divine is somewhat unsettling. In principle, the Kabbalists could have followed many other theologians in seeing God as completely removed from evil, or evil as a mere illusion, or both.
What do you think the Zohar gains by taking its complex stand?

This passage begins with a father (Rabbi Yehudah) answering a question from his son, and continues with a teaching from Rabbi Yitzchak, whose name is the same as Isaac.
What are the implications of these literary choices?