to Question of the Week
to Archives


Q:
The Reb Asks: The Millennium- Is It Good for The Jews?

Well, dear readers, Y2K is almost upon us, and given my moral and spiritual responsibilities as your Friendly Cyber-Neighborhood Reb on the Web and Fearless Content Provider of the Kolel website, it's time to tackle the question on (almost) everybody's mind: what's a reasonable Jewish response to the millennium hype?

What are your Dec. 31st plans? Tell us about them in the Kolel interactive forum, and the Reb will join the discussion.



 

 

A: As befits a website with a social and contextual way of looking at things, a bit of history would be in order. If you've gotten this far, you probably already know that there are at least two calendars in use today: the Jewish calendar, with lunar months modified by solar years, in which the current year is numbered 5760, and the calendar that the rest of North America uses, in which it is the year 1999. This latter calendar is technically known as the Gregorian calendar, because it was instituted by Pope Gregory XIII about 1700 years ago. It replaced the Julian calendar which had been instituted a few hundred years before that, by Julius Caesar (of the salad fame J ), which in turn was a replacement for the older Roman Imperial calendar, which kept getting abused by officials in power who added months to the year to extend their terms in office!

As you can see, a calendar is by definition a human creation, a way of organizing our time and the rhythms of our year, and in fact there are dozens of other calendrical systems now in use, a fact which can be verified by simply typing the word "calendar" into an Internet search engine and getting page after page of different entries, some of which compare one kind of calendar to another- say, the Druid to the Hindu, or the Christian to the Moslem calendar, or the Jewish calendar to the Aztec one, and so on. There isn't even just one "Christian" calendar; to the best of my understanding, certain Eastern Orthodox (Christian) communities will celebrate their millennium a few days later than the rest of the Christian world.

The main feature of the Gregorian calendar, of course, is the centrality of the birth of the Christian messiah. For example, dates before that purportedly seminal event are called BC (before Christ) and afterwards, AD (Latin anno domini, "in the year of our Lord"). Although the Gregorian calendar is merely a social convention for Jews who live in a society that uses it, one interesting Jewish connection has to do with New Year's day itself. If you count from Dec 25th, the day many (but not all) Christians celebrate Christmas, the purported birthday of the Christian messiah, and then count the number of days till Jan 1, you always get - c'mon, do the math.. . . . . . eight. That might ring a bell, because it's on the eighth day that Jewish boys are traditionally circumcised. So, what New Year's Day historically celebrates, according to one way of looking at it, is the circumcision feast of a Jewish boy born about 2000 years ago (if in fact such a boy really existed) whom many people- but not religious Jews of any denomination- believe to be their messiah.

Of course, the Christian connection is very obscure for many people; to them, (Gregorian) New Year's eve is just a big party time, and this year, a VERY big party time. One could argue that the Christian connection is so obscure that Jews just shouldn't worry about it, they should just join their friends and neighbors in a marking of the turn of time, and have fun along with the other members of the society in which we live. Most years, I actually tend to agree with this, but one could also argue that the Christian origins of the celebration of the (Gregorian) New Year are inescapable, even if obscured, and therefore Jews should <not> have anything to do with New Year's Eve parties and the like. This might be comparable to arguments over Christmas trees in public places; some people say they are neutral seasonal symbols, and therefore unoffensive to Jews, while others say that they are clearly signs of a Christian holiday, and thus dangerous when North American governments appear to endorse Christianity as the official civic religion.

So Y2K isn't really a different problem for Jews than any other January 1st, except for the fact that this (Gregorian) New Year's Eve is Friday night, Shabbat in the Jewish week. Clearly, as a rabbi, I'm in favor of Jews celebrating Shabbat according to the custom of their community, and just as clearly, quite a lot of the (Gregorian) New Year's Eve type of activities are not going to be "Y2K Shabbat-Compatible." Shabbat is a special spiritual time to connect with God, self, family, and community; noisy parties and other secular events have a very different feel to them.

OK, so what about marking the Millennium in a way that is compatible with the spirit of Shabbat? Well, that's debatable, as above. If you think (Gregorian) New Year's Eve is inherently Christian, you probably wouldn't want any part of it at your Shabbat table. If you think it's just a nice time for North Americans to celebrate together, then there's probably nothing wrong with making a toast or talking about your hopes for the future or having friends and family over for an extra-long, extra fun Shabbat dinner party. Some synagogues are doing this, but not all for the same reason. Some synagogues are having special Shabbat events that evening because they want to give Jews an alternative to (Gregorian) New Year's Eve, and some are doing it because they want to celebrate the general North American New Year (and millennium) in a particularly Jewish kind of way.

As for Kolel? Well, we're having a Shabbat program (Millennium, Shmillennium) too that night, and probably our reasons include a little bit of both perspectives discussed above. We want to give Jews a wonderful Shabbat experience, but it's a great night to do it, when there will be people who want to escape the Y2K hype, while at the same time, there will be others who want to do something special that night, and might not have elsewhere to go.

So, like many other aspects of life, it seems to me there is a balance here. As Jews, we can't escape the pressures of living as a minority in a Christian society, yet we can try to remember that our Jewish rhythms in time have a deep integrity, and can add immeasurable richness to our lives. There's nothing inherently wrong with celebrating certain aspects of North American culture- Canada Day, or the American Independence Day- but sometimes Judaism takes priority, and for Jews, the primary "New Year's" experience is on Rosh Hashana, when we evaluate our lives and repair what needs fixing. Does that mean we shouldn't party on Dec 31st? My feeling is that thoughtful Jews, who do a bit of research and soul-searching, can trust their gut to know how to balance the pressures of the two civilizations in which we live.

What do you think? What are your Dec. 31st plans? Tell us about them in the Kolel interactive forum, and the Reb will join the discussion.

NJL

Sources: Encarta Internet Encyclopaedia; Encyclopaedia Judaica.

 

last update: December 1999

Got a question for
Reb on the Web?
Visit our
Archived Questions
SHOOT*!
("SHOOT" is the Hebrew acronym for SHe'elot OOTeshuvot (Questions and Answers), the centuries-old dialogue between Jews and their rabbis.)

 

[Home] [Lobby] [Library] [Classroom] [Office] [Lounge] [Gift Shop]

Kolel: The Adult Centre for Liberal Jewish Learning