Reviewed by Rabbi Elyse Goldstein
Gilla Ratzersdorfer Rosen opens Torah of Our Mothers with a story
of how, in her college freshman year, a fellow student tried to
"convert her"- her words- to see that God is male. It is the Rav
(Soloveitchik) in a lecture that convinces her otherwise.
That the Rav would even speak of the duality of God imagery, posit
Gods feminine side, and discuss the maternal presence of Divinity
shows that, since the 60s at least, our understanding of Judaism
and Jewish concepts has been radically affected in all Jewish
sectors by the now clear voice of women and the realization that
the religious needs of women is a "Jewish" issue, not just a 'women's'
issue.
Torah of Our Mothers is a product of this realization. It comes
out of a milieu in which high levels of Judaic female scholarship
is no longer an oxymoron; in which fine, learned women teachers
proliferate in Jerusalem and New York yeshivas; in which places
like Nishmat in Jerusalem can confer the title of yo'etzet halacha
on a woman trained to make halachic decisions for women in the
areas of niddah and taharat hamishpacha. Not only is it unfair
to characterize the Orthodox movement as holding back women from
Torah learning anymore, it is also simply untrue. Thus there is
no question that Torah of the Mothers could not have been written
in any other generation but this, for its rich array of traditional
women who are at once learned, scholarly, yet quite at home in
the Orthodox and even Haredi world are also aware and touched
by secular influences and respectful of the advances that feminism
has brought to them, as well.
But though the authors want us to believe the book is for everyone,
non-Orthodox readers familiar with recent Jewish feminist scholarship
and deeper feminist critique will find the book timid and apologetic.The
title of this book would have been more honest as Contemporary
Traditional Jewish Women Read Classical Jewish texts. It is almost
as if the authors have suddenly discovered the voices we have
been hearing for years. They use heavily male language for God
with absolutely no mention of any theological issues this may
raise. Their footnotes rely on names like Aviva Zornberg, Nehama
Leibowitz, Aryeh Kaplan, and the Lubavitch Rebbe, but there is
no mention of ground-breaking feminist scholarship such as Judith
Plaskows Standing Again at Sinai or Rachel Adlers Engendering
Judaism. Indeed, the last essay, by Esther Shaanan, rather triumphantly
announces, "...we are tapping a precious resource long untapped;
we are at long last developing the Torah studies and novellae
of women." Only one person mentions Nahum Sarna in a footnote;
otherwise there is no sign of any non-Orthodox commentator. The
authors use copious, sometimes voluminous footnotes which distract
from the reading; yet there is no bibliography at the end of the
book.
Torah of the Mothers is in four parts. Part One, "Students and
Teachers" consists of five intimate essays on the relationship
the particular author had with her mentor. This section is fairly
tedious unless you are deeply interested in the authors' personal
relationships with their teachers. It feels as if the essays are
included to give a stamp of kashrut to the book, but these introductory
pieces would have been better as an epilogue or even a separate
book on the subject of the special teacher .
The second part, "Readings of Biblical texts" is the heart of
the book. From the creation of Adam to the daughters of Tzelophechad
(spelled throughout, for some reason I could not fathom, as Tzlafchad),
the essays deal with both male and female characters of the Bible
as paradigmatic figures and role models. Sarah Idit Schneider's
essay "The Daughters of Tzlafchad: Towards a Methodology of Attitude
Around Womens Issues" is the best in the book. Well written and
well researched, Schneider argues persuasively that not only do
the daughters of Tzelophechad present us with a model of change
for women within Judaism, but they also present a ideal for the
way the rabbis should respond to such calls for change. She offers
"guidelines to petitioners" based on midrashim of the daughters
who "presented their petition in a logical and halachically sophisticated
manner." In her Guidelines for Rabbis, she asks for empathy and
openmindeness. But she knows she can't have it all. She writes,
"If the law is clear and closed, so be it." That seems to be the
point of the whole book. She argues that the bottom line is "Although
they hoped for a favorable attitude, they didn't want it if was
not God's highest will for them and for all concerned." A noble
sentiment, but one that does somehow close the argument at the
same time it is being made.
The third part, Readings of Rabbinic Texts, deals with Talmud
and midrashim, and the fourth part entitled Exile and Redemption
is essays on Israel and the Diaspora. Some of the essays deal
with women's writings (for example, The King and His Daughter
in Rabbinic Thought) but most in these two last sections do not.
In an anthology the reader expects a wide range of styles, opinions,
and outcomes. Though the writing is uniformly good, Torah of the
Mothers presents a fairly uniform face in the assortment of essays,
and one senses a predictability to them after a while. The authors
seem almost apologetic when they stray too close to what might
be considered feminist critique, and none of them pushes the envelope,
though Ora Wiskind Elpers essay "Exodus and the Feminine in the
Teachings of Rabbi Yaakov of Izbica" offers a search for a non-stereotypical
way of dealing with gender and the idea of "the feminine" altogether.
The book jacket promises a "landmark collection of essays and
teachings culled from years of Bible and Jewish study by highly
accomplished women Torah scholars and educators." Torah of the
Mothers is landmark in that it gives these traditional women the
opportunity to publish scholarly pieces of interest to women,
but it should acknowledge that it stands in a proud, long lineage
of pioneering books and feminist scholars who long ago paved the
way.
EG