|
|
For some, participating in rituals such as Tashlich (casting of
our sins symbolically in the water on Rosh Hashana), Sukkah, and
the Seder is exhilarating, educational, transformative and meaningful.
But for others, these rituals can feel rote, stifling, boring,
full of agenda and exclusivity that makes us feel like bystanders
to our own tradition. Very often, women feel like the "outsiders"
in these ceremonies. In our day, groups of Jewish women have begun
not only to rewrite and infuse inclusivity into traditional rituals,
but also have begun to "invent" new rituals.
Esther Broner's new book attempts to address traditional ritual
from a feminist viewpoint, while presenting new invented rituals.
When dealing with the "why" of her feminist rituals, she introduces
each section with a good overview of that ritual, its rationale
and history, and then invites the reader to share in the step-by-step
"how." Some of the rituals feel familar, almost homey, like her
Tashlich ceremony for women and her Chanukah ceremony. Her new
rituals for aging, for loss, and for menopause are welcome additions
to a tradition sorely silent at these times. Her rituals for women
at the Wall in Jerusalem are powerful, and she has some beautifully
crafted "political" rituals for healing between Black and Jewish
women and between Arab and Israeli women.
I would have liked a longer introduction, however, about the thrilland
dangerof writing, performing, and then teaching, transmitting
and sharing newly minted ceremonies. The very nature of modern,
invented rituals prevents them from being universally applicable.
When a certain women's group, for example, or a certain group
of friends or even a certain synagogue or chavurah does a new
and creative ritual, it is inexorably tied to the chemistry and
history of that particular group. I have rarely found these rituals
to be "clone-able" to other groups, and thus I have had similar
reservations about other such volumes of women's rituals. So this
book, like other collections of step-by-step instructions for
rituals which go so far as to include all the creative readings,
garb to be worn, music to be sung and steps to be danced by each
participant, will by necessity fall short when it presents Broner's
New York ceremonies as a "paint-by-numbers" for other groups of
women. They just feel too personal, too idiosyncratic to her particular
circle, to be transplanted as they are to other communities and
other circles of women.
That does not mean they cannot be used as a blueprint, as inspiration
or a jumping-off point, for surely our rich tradition must make
room for these new kinds of rites that speak to women's experiences
and come not only from the heart but also from within the very
Jewish tradition we are trying to stretch.
Rabbi Elyse Goldstein |